Showing posts with label ENERGY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ENERGY. Show all posts

LED's Good Housekeeping Seal

By Eric A. Taub
Energy Star

Professional conferences always have refrains, leitmotifs that begin to define the thrust of many of the discussions. One of the popular ones at last week's Solid State Lighting Conference in San Francisco was, "We don't want to screw up like we did with compact fluorescents."

The point was that when compact fluorescent bulbs first hit the market, they were poorly engineered, overpriced and oversized alternatives to traditional light bulbs. They buzzed, created harsh light, took 30 seconds to warm up, and didn't last as long as promised.

The trick is how to avoid that problem with LED lighting, the technology that many believe will eventually replace most other lighting technologies in office buildings and homes.

As I've noted before, there is already plenty of LED junk for sale in the nation's home improvement stores. Many products use significantly more power than they claim and last a fraction of the time they advertise. At the conference, lighting designers chimed in to say that they rarely found LED products that performed properly.

"Some LED products are only delivering 30 percent of the illumination that they claim," said James Brodrick, the Department of Energy's solid state lighting head.

To stem the disaster of a potential consumer backlash against a technology that, done right, could have major positive environmental impacts, the D.O.E. is bringing LED lighting products into its Energy Star program.

Those products that get Energy Star certification will have to perform according to a set of Energy Department guidelines, as to the amount of light they produce and their effective life.

A handful (but just a handful) of products have received the Energy Star imprimatur. But Mr. Brodrick thinks he'll have up to 300 LED certified products by the end of the year.

If his agency pulls it off, it could help provide a comfort level for consumers concerned about new technologies. It's just too bad there's no Energy Star certification for price. With early LED replacement lamps priced at $60 a pop, the industry could use one.

The Costs of Not Building Green

Despite the narrowing gap in cost between green building and traditional “to-code” building, most builders and home buyers still perceive the green option to be significantly more expensive. The reality is that due to increased builder education and an influx of affordable green building products, a building can be built green within the same budget as a non-green building. According to Clark Wilson, CEO of Austin based Green Builders, Inc., “It’s our job as builders to find those green products that don’t drive up the price of the home.” Rick Hunter of the St. Louis green building firm Sage Homebuilders agrees: “With proper planning and a little experience, building green, even certified green, can be done for about the same cost. We are building certified green homes at the highest levels of certification for less than 1% cost increase.“ For an informative breakdown on how green buildings cost from 0 to 2% more than non-green buildings, check out “The True Costs of Building Green” from the folks at Buildings.com.

Now that green building is an affordable option, it’s time to change the way we frame the affordability debate. Too long have supporters of green building been on the defensive, forced to justify the costs of building more energy efficient, healthier, more sustainable homes. Instead of focusing on the costs of making your building green, let’s talk about the costs of not building green.

Energy

For those strictly interested in a financial reason to go green, the energy savings of a green building speak for themselves. With the help of the EPA’s ENERGY STAR program, advances in energy efficiency have resulted in savings of 40 to 60% over non-green buildings. Greater focus on appropriately sized HVAC systems, tight construction and ducts, effective insulation, and energy efficient windows can save a significant amount of energy and money. Add in the water savings from low-flow fixtures, tankless water heaters, very efficient appliances, greywater systems, water-friendly landscaping, and rainwater collection systems and it’s clear how wasteful a non-green building can be. Save a little bit of money now by ignoring these green options and you could be throwing away money for years.

Health

You wouldn’t buy baby bottles with potentially harmful chemicals or toys with toxic paint, so why would you buy a whole house with both? Paints, adhesives, and caulks can all contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs,) the greatest causes of indoor air pollution in the home, which have been tied to increased asthma rates. Wood products in the home can contain urea-formaldehyde, a known carcinogen that is banned in Canada and Europe and soon will be on its way out in California. The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory studied indoor air pollution in homes and “found moderate to strong increases in respiratory and allergic health effects among children in homes with higher concentrations of selected VOCs.”

Companies that still manufacture products with urea-formaldehyde or other VOCs continue to do so because it costs them less to produce and consumers continue to choose the less expensive, but less healthy, choice. I’d like to think this is because of a lack of awareness of the health risks of such chemicals, rather than a conscious choice to expose their families to toxic chemicals. A green building not only reduces, if not eliminates, such toxic chemicals, it constantly cleans the air through efficient HVAC and ventilation systems.

The potential health risks of non-green buildings are reason enough for many to choose to build green.

Sustainability

Third in the green trinity is sustainability, the environmental cost of your building project. Green builders start by significantly reducing waste on building sites. While building materials that are not recycled or made from renewable materials might seem less expensive, the cost to the environment must be considered. And it’s not just the sustainability of the product that should be considered, but the company’s manufacturing process as well. Naysayers point out that individuals can do little to nothing to affect the environment, but if consumers begin to favor environmentally friendly products made from companies that have cleaned up their manufacturing process, including reducing waste and using renewable energy, then other companies will be forced to follow suit. Companies that have earned the Cradle to Cradle certification represent the height of sustainability.

If products were forced to label their environmental impact and embodied energy, consumers would think twice about many products. Green builders seek out durable materials that leave a lighter impact on the environment.

Parting Thoughts

The energy, health, and environmental costs make traditional, “to-code” building much too expensive. It will also be expensive for the builders themselves. As Rick Hunter points out, “Most builders have still not fully realized that we are entering a whole new era of building; the builders that make the changes now will be the ones that prosper, those that take the wait and see approach, will ultimately be hurt.”

The builders I know don’t like to be associated with anything shoddy or cheap, much less unhealthy, so it’s only a matter of time before green building practices are adopted as the norm. The term “builder quality” is used to describe the cheapest and lowest quality material available while still within code. Isn’t it time for builders to take back the term “builder quality” and make it something positive? Here’s your new slogan: Green: The New Builder Quality.

Energy Efficiency Tops with Green Home Owners

"Greater energy efficiency drives consumers to choose a green-built home,” according to a survey by the National Association of Home Builders. With the cost of fuel skyrocketing, and consumers looking to fuel efficient cars to help at the pump, it is no surprise that they would also be looking for energy efficiency from their buildings.

According to the survey, which polled 800 registered voters about how important certain features would be in their decision to build a green home or remodel their current home to be more green, 64% said that energy efficiency would be the most important feature, the healthier environment of green homes came in second at 55%, and 49% percent believed it would be the right thing to do for the environment.

Home builders and designers who can provide energy efficient homes will have a better chance of surviving the recent housing slump. While general home sales are down, recent studies have shown that the sale of green homes is remaining steady. Green houses also tend to be worth more.

The one concern most consumers have is the cost of green homes. While tax credits and rebates help, home owners should be looking at the long term benefits of owning green. With lower energy and maintenance costs over time, the additional premium is worth it. Also, as technology and building techniques evolve, construction costs will come down.

In today’s volatile fuel market, energy efficient buildings are going to be all the rage, and delivering quality homes at a reasonable price will help many builders rise above the slumping market.

Published on July 11th, 2008

Solar Photovoltaic Rebate Program Introduced into Senate

Ten Million Solar Roofs In Ten Years
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has introduced a new bill into the Senate to help ease the cost for homeowners wanting to install solar panels. The 10 Million Solar Roofs Act of 2008 will offer rebates for up to half the installation costs of solar photovoltaic systems, and would be in place for the next ten years. In addition to private homes and businesses, non-profit organizations, and state and local governments would be eligible for the rebates.

Read More

10 Ways to Cut Home Energy Consumption

Editor’s note: Our friends at Low Impact Living point out 10 ways you can save energy this summer. This post was originally published on June 10th, 2008.

The heat of summer is coming, and that means many of us are about to crank up the AC, make an extra batch of ice, and generally burn energy like it’s our job. But we need all need to continue to try to conserve as much energy as possible to conserve resources and slow the march of global warming. And we get to save money at the same time–woo hoo to that!

Here are the ten things we can all do at home to cut our energy consumption. We start out nice and easy, then ramp up to some extra-credit methods at the end of the list for you Climate Crusaders.

1. Resist the urge to live in a refrigerator.
78 degrees is plenty cool in the house. Turn down the AC and get a programmable thermostat so you’re only cooling the house when you really need to.

2. Air dry your dishes and clothes.
The dryer and dish washer use a lot of energy– and the air does the drying job just as well. See some great clothes-drying racks here.

3. Take shorter showers and do not take baths.
Hot water heating is one of the major uses of energy in any home. Showers are the way to go– and keep ‘em short. Baths use much more water and heat than do baths (unless you’re taking 30 minute showers!).

4. Make sure you have energy-efficient lighting throughout your home.
Everyone has heard about compact fluorescent lights by now– but are you up to date on LED lights? Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have come a long way, baby, and they are often 10 times more efficient than compact fluorescents.

5. Ditch the beer fridge.
It’s amazing how many homes have two refrigerators. Please do not use more than one fridge. And if you have an old model, get a newer Energy Star model.

6. Use ceiling fans rather than AC.
They are much more energy-efficient and you can get very reasonably priced Energy Star models.

7. Get solar screens for your windows.
These screens cut 75% of the heat coming through your windows, but don’t impact your visibility. They are really great energy savers. See them here.

8. Plant trees!
Placing deciduous trees on the South side of your home is a great way to block summer heat, but keep the sun shining on your home in the winter when you need the warmth.

9. Spend one night each week in candlelight.
It’s romantic, fun and inspires new conversation. If you’ve got kids, how about turning off the TV one night and playing a board game by candlelight? Clue would be particularly spooky!

10. Use a solar oven for some cooking.
They really work! You don’t want that hot oven on in your house anyway. You can either buy a solar oven, or you can learn to make one yourself. It’s another fun summer activity to do with your kids.

** #11: For the truly hard core, here’s a great tip I learned in Africa.

If you don’t have or don’t use AC, at night you can wet a scarf or towel or sheet and lay it on your chest. The evaporative cooling effect will really do the trick for you.

9 Ways to Make Your Home More Energy Efficient

imageby Harvey Sachs, 09/04/06


Harvey M. Sachs, Ph.D., directs the Buildings Program at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). He works on building codes, equipment standards, and market transformation to increase the use of better products and practices. His research focuses on emerging technologies and practices. Before joining ACEEE, he was policy director of the Center for Global Change at the University of Maryland. Sachs has also served as assistant commissioner for energy in the New Jersey Department of Commerce, Energy, and Economic Development and as technical director of the Geothermal Heat Pump Consortium.

The house is a system. You save money and improve performance when you take cost-effective measures that reduce building loads, and then install systems and appliances that are the right size to meet the reduced loads. In general, oversizing worsens performance and increases costs.

The most effective strategy for improving household energy efficiency is to first target your home’s envelope—walls, attic, windows, and doors. Then reduce the energy consumption of systems, such as heating, cooling, lighting and appliances. Finally, consider clean energy generation (solar, geothermal, and so on).

1. Make sure your walls and attic are well insulated.

Effective insulation slows the rate that heat flows out of the house in winter or into the house in summer, so less energy is required to heat or cool the house. If your house has no wall insulation, and it has more-or-less continuous wall cavities (such as conventional stud walls), blown-in insulation can greatly improve your comfort and save enough energy to be very cost-effective. (It rarely pays to blow additional insulation into already insulated walls.) If your attic is unfinished, it often pays to upgrade its insulation.

Your contractor’s expertise is more important than the insulation material you choose. Properly installed fiberglass, cellulose and most foam insulation materials vary little in their R-value (a rating of a material’s resistance to heat flow) or the heat conduction of the completed wall system. The key is “properly installed.” Ideally, the contractor will use an infrared camera during or after installation to look for voids.

2. Upgrade or replace windows.

If your windows are old and leaky, it may be time to replace them with energy-efficient models or boost their efficiency with weatherstripping and storm windows. It is almost never cost-effective to replace windows just to save energy: in most houses, windows account for less than 15 percent of the heat loss, so even if you replaced all the windows with perfect insulators, you would save at most 15 percent. But if you are replacing windows for other reasons, in many areas the cost of upgrading to Energy Star–rated windows is very modest, perhaps $15 per window. This upgrade would be cost-effective—and increase your comfort to boot.

3. Plant shade trees and shrubs around your house.

If your house is older, with relatively poor insulation and windows, good landscaping (particularly deciduous trees) can save energy, especially if planted on the house’s west side. In summer, the foliage blocks infrared radiation that would warm the house, while in winter the bare branches let this radiation come through. Of course, if your house has very good insulation and Energy Star or better windows, the effect is much, much smaller because the building shell itself is already blocking almost all the heat gain.

4. Replace an older furnace with a high-efficiency system.

If your furnace was built before 1992 and has a standing pilot, it probably wastes 35 percent of the fuel it uses, and it may be near the end of its service life. In this case, in climates with at least 4,500 to 5,000 heating degree days, ACEEE recommends early replacement with a condensing furnace with annual efficiency of at least 90 percent. This type of furnace wastes no more than 10 percent of the natural gas you buy, and may save you as much as 27 percent on your heating bill.

If your furnace was installed after 1991, it probably has an annual fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE) rating of 80 percent, so the savings from replacement is smaller, but would be at least 11 percent if the unit is working perfectly. Your heating service technician or energy auditor may be able to help you determine the AFUE of your present system.

5. Improve the efficiency of your hot water system.

First, turn down the temperature of your water heater to the warm setting (120°F), particularly for fossil-fuel water heaters with their high standby losses. Second, insulate your hot water lines so they don’t cool off as quickly between uses. Third, use low-flow fixtures for showers and baths. While storage water heater standards were raised in 2001, it was probably not enough to justify throwing out an existing water heater that is working well.

Advanced contractors are now installing “on demand” hot water circulating loops that use a small pump to accelerate delivery of hot water to remote fixtures, which works great with low-flow fixtures. These are activated when users turn on a bathroom or kitchen tap, and turn off when hot water reaches the fixture. In ACEEE’s opinion, a continuous recirculating “hotel” loop wastes enormous amounts of water heating energy, and electricity for pumping.

6. Replace incandescent lights with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs).

CFLs can save three-quarters of the electricity used by incandescents. Most people don’t think about the fact that the electricity to run a lightbulb costs much more than the bulb itself. One of the new CFLs costs about $3, but it lasts 10,000 hours and uses only about 27 watts to generate as much light as a 100-watt incandescent bulb. During its life, it uses about $22 in electricity, so the total cost is about $25. A 100-watt incandescent bulb costs 50 cents, but lasts 1,000 hours so you need 10 of them ($5 to buy) to last 10,000 hours. In those 10,000 hours you will use 1,000 kilowatts of electricity, which will cost more than $80 at a national average price. So the lighting cost of the CFL is less than one-third of the cost for the incandescent. The best targets for replacement are are 60- to 100-watt bulbs used several hours a day, because usage affects how long it takes to recover the investment.

7. If you are thinking of buying a new refrigerator, don’t leave the old one plugged in, in the basement, as a backup for party supplies and liquid refreshment.

Electricity to operate the old one isn’t free: figure an extra $50-150 per year to run it. In contrast, the new one, particularly if Energy Star rated, may cost only $30-60 per year to run because refrigerator efficiency has improved so much in the past three decades. Under these circumstances, think about how much refrigeration you really need. The best rule is to have only one refrigerator, and to size it to meet your real needs. That allows the luxury of ice-makers and similar conveniences with a clear conscience.

8. Take advantage of new tax incentives to improve your home.

The 2005 Federal Energy Bill offers tax credits for exemplary residential efficiency purchases in 2006 and 2007. For existing houses, the available credits are 10 percent of the improvement cost (the tax rebate is capped at $500 total, with smaller caps for certain improvements) for many measures, including: insulation and envelope improvements meeting International Code Council (ICC) specifications; windows meeting ICC specifications; central air conditioners or heat pumps meeting 2006 Consortium for Energy Efficiency specifications; furnaces and boilers with AFUE of 95 or better; water heaters with Energy Factor of .80 or better; heat pump water heaters with an Energy Factor of 2.0 or better; and ground source heat pumps meeting specified performance levels.

9. Schedule an energy audit for more expert advice on your home as a whole.

Energy auditors and raters use specialized tools and skills to evaluate your home and recommend the most cost-effective measures to improve its comfort and efficiency, as well as the best sequence for doing them to take advantage of interactions. The rater can also provide independent verification of contractors’ work quality. Look for raters who are RESNET Accredited. In some regions, there are Home Performance with Energy Star programs, too. Most of these programs include low-cost home assessment and strong quality assurance practices and/or inspections.

*TIP*

Heating and cooling account for 44 percent of the average home’s energy use. They should be your first priority where energy efficiency is concerned.

For example, a 10 percent reduction in the energy used to heat and cool your home will cut overall household energy use by 4.4 percent and save hundreds of dollars within a few years.

GEOTHERMAL ~ RETURN ON INVESTMENT

There are two questions people always ask prior to committing to geothermal technology.

1)When or what is my pay off?
2). If I choose, or have to sell my house prior to my "pay off" will I recover my investment? The simple answers are;
1) Your pay off is immediate, they generate their own fuel.
2) Yes, you will recover your investment even if you sell your house before your pay off.

The questions you should be asking are; how will I reinvest the money I am saving annually by not having to purchase fossil fuel? Or, why would you pay for fuel when you can own the refinery?

Geothermal heat pumps generate their own primary fuel (stored, compressed and redistributed solar energy) greater in value than fossil fuels because the supply is endless and your system increases in value as fuel prices go up. Their operating cost is 350 to 400 percent less than their output! (Return on investment: one kilowatt of electricity used to operate the pump, heat generated 3 to 4 kilowatts of heat )

Considering geothermal is one of the smartest investment decisions you will make in your life. Comparing geothermal to a standard heating and cooling system cannot do justice to the financial advantage geothermal holds over the head of standard space conditioning systems. No one would argue the environmental benefit of geothermal, having eliminated on-site emissions of carbon monoxide, the silent killer and carbon dioxide the global warmer. But lets look closer economically at a standard system. Unfortunately, for you the consumer, it is a disposable item. It is used up, disposed of, a new unit purchased, and the cycle is repeated. If that were not enough of a financial drain you are hit again with monthly fossil fuel charges, operation and maintenance costs. Not only is there no "pay-back", but your forced by planned obsolescence to repeat the cycle. There is only negative cash flow during the entire cycle. You pay it off, replace it and the cycle begins again, not to un-similar, to owning a car.

THE PAY OFF
Heat pumps generate primary energy no different from a windmill or hydroelectric plant. Yes, they have both an initial cost and the cost of electricity to run the pump. However, for every kilowatt you spend to operate them, they generate between 3 and 5 kilowatts back, making them 300 to 500% efficient. That is both the pay off and return on investment as simple as it get. You pay for one you get four in return. They are even more efficient than our new super windmills. Other costs of operation you ask, their only scheduled maintenance is changing the air filter. There are no annual inspections or tune up fees to see if it is burning correctly or leaking poisonous gases. However, what makes heat pumps the best investment decision you will ever make in your life? The answer is the loop field.

The heat pump component of your system is one-half of your system and it is located in your home. The loop field component is the other half that is buried in your yard. The heat pump components have a 20 to 30 year projected lifespan. Their individual components such as a valve or compressor may have to be replaced or rebuilt, however the loop field portion of your system will last for 200 years. It is an equity item, whose market value at any time is equal to its replacement cost, and whose market value for its ability to generate energy cannot be surpassed by any other single item built into your home, other than location, location, location.

By lowering the operation cost of your home, you will free up revenue to reinvest, at your discretion in your overall financial future. Consider this; on a 6000 square foot home recently retrofitted. The client�s $3482.00 dollar annual heating and cooling bill was reduced to $760.00 dollars! This freed up $2721.00 dollars. Invested incrementally and annually over 30 years with a 10% return would net $495,000.00 dollars, money you would have burned up purchasing fossil fuels. Now ask yourself again if you can afford a geothermal system. You cannot afford not to.

The 20-year return on investment is typically around 10 percent. Therefore, the minute your system is up and running you are making back the capitol you invested as well as guarding against budget fluctuations in the cost of fossil fuels, something that we unfortunately have no control over. Do you still want to stick with what you have now? Settling for what you have now is unfortunate when you can afford to produce your own energy typically with no more investment than what you already have budgeted for fossil fuels.

Cost of living increases for fossil fuels are approximately 3%, for electric it is typically 1%. In addition, the geothermal heating and cooling system is guarded for the life of ownership against fossil fuel inflation or supply shortages.

People's initial reaction is "Who pays that much for a heating and cooling system?" "That's outrageous". The answer is the person who does their homework. It is only perception, which holds you back from making the most intelligent purchase decision of your life.

Before you ask us for an estimate, you need to have already made your decision to go with geothermal based on what was written above. The initial cost which is typically between $19,500.00 for a 1000 square foot home( actually 2000, which includes the basement and one floor both 1000 square feet) and $27,000.00 for a 5000 square foot home. Cost will vary locally depending on many factors.

Inner Earth Energy Copyright 2007

ENERGY AND $ SAVING IDEAS

In the following list, the higher the level, the more cost effective the choices are for reducing energy use in your house/business. So, ideally, one should exhaust the possibilities at the highest level before implementing lower level actions.

PAYBACK IN YEARS and ACTION

0: Get a free energy audit (Cape Light Compact: 800-797-6699), lower house thermostat setting, combine/minimize automobile trips, replace lawn area with garden or natural landscape.

½ - 2: Solar Pool Heat Installation.

1-5: Add Attic Insulation; Replace Light Bulbs & Appliances with more energy efficient ones.

3-7: Solar Domestic Hot Water Installation using tax credits.

3-8: Add Window Quilts or Thermal Shades; Install a Wood/Pellet Stove.

5-7: Groundwater Source Cooling/Dehumidifying.

6-8: Wind Power and/or Photovoltaic Solar Installation using MTC (Massachusetts Technology Collaborative) incentive money and tax credits.

6-10: Replace Heating Equipment/Automobile with updated, more efficient technology.

10-15: Reside Building with added insulation & new windows.

15-20: Install Solar Space Heating

COTUIT SOLAR


Geothermal Heating and Cooling

Geothermal (Ground Source) Heat Pumps work similar to air source heat pumps, except the energy is transferred to the ground instead of to the atmosphere. The higher efficiency that can be achieved from a geothermal heat pump is due to the relatively stable ground temperature during the heating and cooling seasons compared to the variable air temperature of air source heat pumps. While these systems are more efficient than standard air source heat pumps or air conditioning units, they are also more expensive to install and will run upwards of $5,000 to $10,000 for the installed system.


Figure 27: Schematic of a Ground Source Heat Pump

There are three types of geothermal heat pumps, open loop, closed loop, and direct exchange (DX).

Open Loop

In an open loop system, ground water is used as the heat exchange fluid between the ground and the refrigerant loop. Water is drawn out of the ground and circulated through a heat exchange tank containing the refrigerant line. This is not a very common system due to the potential problems with dirt and debris and general water quality issues that may be encountered from using the natural ground water.

Closed Loop

The closed loop system is the most common system used with geothermal heat pumps. This system uses plastic tubing that is run through either vertical or horizontal wells to transfer the energy to the ground. While similar to an open loop system in that the water is circulated through a heat exchange tank containing the refrigerant line of the heat pump, in this system the water used is not connected to the ground water, but instead run in the plastic tubing. This controls the water quality used in the system, and therefore reduces the potential for problems and maintenance. In heating climates, there is a concern for freezing of the system and therefore some form of anti-freeze will need to be added to the ground loop system.

Direct Exchange

Direct Exchange systems run the refrigerant line directly into the ground, eliminating the heat exchange fluid. Because this extra heat transfer step is eliminated from the design, the system should be more efficient. In this system, copper lines are installed into the ground and the refrigerant of the system is circulated through them. Copper, due to it’s higher thermal conductivity is better able to exchange the heat with the ground when compared to a water circulated system with plastic pipe. While more efficient, there are some considerations that need to be made.

The cost of the system is higher due to the use of copper tubing instead of plastic tubing. Depending on the number and depth of the wells required, this can create a significant cost to the system. The system also has to be site charged with refrigerant, so unlike factory built closed loop GSHP systems, the efficiency is based on the quality of the installation.

Design Considerations

In order for the system to perform properly there must be adequate heat exchange with the ground. The heat exchange is through either vertical or horizontal wells in which the heat exchange fluid is circulated. A general rule of thumb is that a 200 ft ground well is required for each ton of cooling needed. Therefore, for a 3 ton cooling load, three 200 ft wells, would be needed.

From the heat pump side, there are generally two systems currently being used on the market, a packaged system and a split system.

In the packaged system, the compressor and heat exchange fluid to the interior of the house and integrated into the air handler. The benefit of this system is that the charging of the refrigerant line is all done in the factory under controlled conditions and it is a fairly simple installation and connection to the ground loops at the site. On the other hand, the compressor is now inside the house, and issues with noise can sometimes occur.

Split systems place the compressor and heat exchange fluid on the exterior and the refrigerant line is run to the air handler as in more conventional air source heat pumps. This reduces the noise inside the house; however the refrigerant charge must now be determined on site by a mechanical contractor.

Energy Model Results

The system used in the energy model is based on the specifications of a ClimateMaster Genesis Packaged Unit. The efficiency of the system is based on the entering water temperature. Therefore the performance of the system used in the energy model was based on the expected entering (returning) water temperature in the both the heating and cooling seasons. This entering water temperature is a function of the average ground temperature and the heat transfer efficiency of the ground. This resulted in a 17 EER for cooling and a 3.0 COP for heating. The resultant incremental whole house energy consumption reduction was 5.5%.

Building Science Consulting
Contact Us